↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review comparing neurodevelopmental outcome in term infants with hypoxic and vascular brain injury with and without seizures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review comparing neurodevelopmental outcome in term infants with hypoxic and vascular brain injury with and without seizures
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12887-018-1116-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. R. De Haan, J. Langeslag, J. H. van der Lee, A. H. van Kaam

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that neonatal seizures in term neonates with stroke, asphyxia or brain haemorrhage might be associated with adverse neurodevelopment and development of epilepsy. The extent of this association is not known. The objective of this study was to assess the possible impact of neonatal seizures on these outcomes and if possible calculate a relative risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed (study period January 2000-June 2015). PubMed, Medline and Embase were searched for cohort studies evaluating neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of at least 18 months or development of epilepsy in surviving term neonates with or without neonatal seizures. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed and data extractions were performed in a standardized manner by independent reviewers. Pooled Relative Risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals for adverse outcome were calculated if possible. Out of 1443 eligible studies 48 were selected for full text reading leaving 9 cohort studies for the final analyses (4 studies on stroke, 4 on perinatal asphyxia and one on cerebral hemorrhage). For all cases with stroke or asphyxia combined the pooled risk ratio (RR) for adverse outcome when suffering neonatal seizures was 7.42 (3.84-14.34); for neonates with perinatal asphyxia: 8.41 (4.07-17.39) and for neonates with stroke: 4.95 (1.07-23.0). The pooled RR for development of late onset epilepsy could only be determined for infants suffering from stroke: 1.48 (0.82-2.68). Results were biased and evidence sparse. The presence of neonatal seizures in term newborns with vascular or hypoxic brain injury may have an impact on or be a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome. The biased available data yield insufficient evidence about the true size of this association.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 28 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 30 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,953,365
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#947
of 3,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,101
of 327,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#39
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.