You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chinese expert consensus on programming deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Neurodegeneration, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40035-018-0116-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shengdi Chen, Guodong Gao, Tao Feng, Jianguo Zhang, The Chinese Medical Association neurosurgery branch of functional neurosurgery group, The Chinese Medical Association neurology branch of Parkinson’s disease, Movement disorders group, The Chinese Physician Association neurosurgeon branch of functional neurosurgery expert committee, The Chinese Physician Association neurologist branch of Parkinson’s disease and Movement disorders professional committee, Chinese expert committee on Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease |
| Abstract |
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD) is now a well-established option for some patients. Postoperative standardized programming processes can improve the level of postoperative management and programming, relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. In order to improve the quality of the programming, the experts on DBS and PD in neurology and neurosurgery in China reviewed the relevant literatures and combined their own experiences and developed this expert consensus on the programming of deep brain stimulation in patients with PD in China. This Chinese expert consensus on postoperative programming can standardize and improve postoperative management and programming of DBS for PD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Greece | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Translational Neurodegeneration
#294
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,572
of 338,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Neurodegeneration
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.