↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative evaluation of the immunodeficiency of a mouse strain by tumor engraftments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative evaluation of the immunodeficiency of a mouse strain by tumor engraftments
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13045-015-0156-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Ye, Zhiwu Jiang, Guan-Xiong Li, Yiren Xiao, Simiao Lin, Yunxin Lai, Suna Wang, Baiheng Li, Bei Jia, Yin Li, Zhi-liang Huang, Jin Li, Fenglan Feng, Shuhua Li, Huihui Yao, Zixia Liu, Su Cao, Lin Xu, Yangqiu Li, Donghai Wu, Lingwen Zeng, Mei Zhong, Pentao Liu, Zhe-sheng Wen, Bing Xu, Yao Yao, Duanqing Pei, Peng Li

Abstract

The mouse is an organism that is widely used as a mammalian model for studying human physiology or disease, and the development of immunodeficient mice has provided a valuable tool for basic and applied human disease research. Following the development of large-scale mouse knockout programs and genome-editing tools, it has become increasingly efficient to generate genetically modified mouse strains with immunodeficiency. However, due to the lack of a standardized system for evaluating the immuno-capacity that prevents tumor progression in mice, an objective choice of the appropriate immunodeficient mouse strains to be used for tumor engrafting experiments is difficult. In this study, we developed a tumor engraftment index (TEI) to quantify the immunodeficiency response to hematologic malignant cells and solid tumor cells of six immunodeficient mouse strains and C57BL/6 wild-type mouse (WT). Mice with a more severely impaired immune system attained a higher TEI score. We then validated that the NOD-scid-IL2Rg-/- (NSI) mice, which had the highest TEI score, were more suitable for xenograft and allograft experiments using multiple functional assays. The TEI score was effectively able to reflect the immunodeficiency of a mouse strain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,174,660
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#309
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,076
of 265,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.