↓ Skip to main content

Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirkjan Schokker, Gosse Veninga, Stephanie A. Vastenhouw, Alex Bossers, Freddy M. de Bree, Lucia M. T. E. Kaal-Lansbergen, Johanna M. J. Rebel, Mari A. Smits

Abstract

Host genetic makeup plays a role in early gut microbial colonization and immune programming. Interactions between gut microbiota and host cells of the mucosal layer are of paramount importance for a proper development of host defence mechanisms. For different livestock species, it has already been shown that particular genotypes have increased susceptibilities towards disease causing pathogens. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of genotypic variation on both early microbial colonization of the gut and functional development of intestinal tissue. From two genetically diverse chicken lines intestinal content samples were taken for microbiota analyses and intestinal tissue samples were extracted for gene expression analyses, both at three subsequent time-points (days 0, 4, and 16). The microbiota composition was significantly different between lines on each time point. In contrast, no significant differences were observed regarding changes in the microbiota diversity between the two lines throughout this study. We also observed trends in the microbiota data at genus level when comparing lines X and Y. We observed that approximately 2000 genes showed different temporal gene expression patterns when comparing line X to line Y. Immunological related differences seem to be only present at day 0, because at day 4 and 16 similar gene expression is observed for these two lines. However, for genes involved in cell cycle related processes the data show higher expression over the whole course of time in line Y in comparison to line X. These data suggest the genetic background influences colonization of gut microbiota after hatch in combination with the functional development of intestinal mucosal tissue, including the programming of the immune system. The results indicate that genetically different chicken lines have different coping mechanisms in early life to cope with the outside world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 39%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,622,486
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,786
of 11,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,948
of 271,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#46
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,099 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.