You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-018-0793-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elissa Burton, Keith D. Hill, Nicola T. Lautenschlager, Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Gill Lewin, Eileen Boyle, Erin Howie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 45% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 18% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,935,366
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,288
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,104
of 328,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.