You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating glymphatic pathway function utilizing clinically relevant intrathecal infusion of CSF tracer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijun Yang, Benjamin T Kress, Harris J Weber, Meenakshisundaram Thiyagarajan, Baozhi Wang, Rashid Deane, Helene Benveniste, Jeffrey J Iliff, Maiken Nedergaard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 386 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 73 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 20% |
| Unknown | 58 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 85 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 4% |
| Engineering | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 76 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,810,555
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#492
of 4,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,947
of 205,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.