↓ Skip to main content

Inflammation-associated microbiota in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inflammation-associated microbiota in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis
Published in
Microbiome, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40168-015-0085-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alain J Benitez, Christian Hoffmann, Amanda B. Muir, Kara K. Dods, Jonathan M. Spergel, Frederic D. Bushman, Mei-Lun Wang

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic disorder characterized by eosinophil-predominant esophageal inflammation, which can be ameliorated by food antigen restriction. Though recent studies suggest that changes in dietary composition may alter the distal gut microbiome, little is currently known about the impact of a restricted diet upon microbial communities of the oral and esophageal microenvironments in the context of EoE. We hypothesize that the oral and esophageal microbiomes of EoE patients are distinct from non-EoE controls, that these differences correspond to changes in esophageal inflammation, and that targeted therapeutic dietary intervention may influence community structure. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized the bacterial composition of the oral and esophageal microenvironments using oral swabs and esophageal biopsies from 35 non-EoE pediatric controls and compared this cohort to samples from 33 pediatric EoE subjects studied in a longitudinal fashion before and after defined dietary changes. Firmicutes were more abundant in esophageal samples compared to oral. Proportions of bacterial communities were significantly different comparing all EoE esophageal microbiota to non-EoE controls, with enrichment of Proteobacteria, including Neisseria and Corynebacterium in the EoE cohort, and predominance of the Firmicutes in non-EoE control subjects. We detected a statistically significant difference between actively inflamed EoE biopsies and non-EoE controls. Overall, though targeted dietary intervention did not lead to significant differences in either oral or esophageal microbiota, reintroduction of highly allergenic foods led to enrichment in Ganulicatella and Campylobacter genera in the esophagus. In conclusion, the esophageal microbiome in EoE is distinct from that of non-EoE controls, with maximal differences observed during active allergic inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 15 11%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,371,023
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,244
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,433
of 282,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.