↓ Skip to main content

Tracking sharks without teeth: a non-invasive rigid tag attachment for large predatory sharks

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 258)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking sharks without teeth: a non-invasive rigid tag attachment for large predatory sharks
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40317-015-0044-9
Authors

Taylor K. Chapple, Adrian C. Gleiss, Oliver J. D. Jewell, Martin Wikelski, Barbara A. Block

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Other 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 48%
Environmental Science 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,380,581
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#32
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,958
of 281,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.