↓ Skip to main content

Development and evaluation of oral Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (QOL-OC)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and evaluation of oral Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (QOL-OC)
Published in
BMC Cancer, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4378-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Nie, Chang Liu, Yi-Chen Pan, Chen-Xi Jiang, Bao-Ru Li, Xi-Jie Yu, Xin-Yu Wu, Shu-Ning Zheng

Abstract

In this study scales and items for the Oral Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire (QOL-OC) were designed and the instrument was evaluated. The QOL-OC was developed and modified using the international definition of quality of life (QOL) promulgated by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and analysis of the precedent measuring instruments. The contents of each item were determined in the context of the specific characteristics of oral cancer. Two hundred thirteen oral cancer patients were asked to complete both the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLC-C30) and the QOL-OC. Data collected was used to conduct factor analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity. Questionnaire compliance was relatively high. Fourteen of the 213 subjects accepted the same tests after 24 to 48 h demonstrating a high test-retest reliability for all five scales. Overall internal consistency surpasses 0.8. The outcome of the factor analysis coincides substantially with our theoretical conception. Each item shows a higher correlation coefficient within its own scale than the others which indicates high construct validity. QOL-OC demonstrates fairly good statistical reliability, validity, and feasibility. However, further tests and modification are needed to ensure its applicability to the quality-of-life assessment of Chinese oral cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 47%