↓ Skip to main content

Female genital cutting (FGC) and the ethics of care: community engagement and cultural sensitivity at the interface of migration experiences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Female genital cutting (FGC) and the ethics of care: community engagement and cultural sensitivity at the interface of migration experiences
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-14-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bilkis Vissandjée, Shereen Denetto, Paula Migliardi, Jodi Proctor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 24%
Student > Master 47 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 53 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 55 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 22%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Psychology 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 62 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#712,825
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#730
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,451
of 241,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.