↓ Skip to main content

Malaria-like symptoms associated with a natural Plasmodium reichenowi infection in a chimpanzee

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria-like symptoms associated with a natural Plasmodium reichenowi infection in a chimpanzee
Published in
Malaria Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0743-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anaïs Herbert, Larson Boundenga, Anne Meyer, Diamella Nancy Moukodoum, Alain Prince Okouga, Céline Arnathau, Patrick Durand, Julie Magnus, Barthélémy Ngoubangoye, Eric Willaume, Cheikh Tidiane Ba, Virginie Rougeron, François Renaud, Benjamin Ollomo, Franck Prugnolle

Abstract

Although Plasmodium infections have never been clearly associated with symptoms in non-human primates, the question of the pathogenicity of Plasmodium parasites in non-human primates still remains unanswered. A young chimpanzee, followed before and after release to a sanctuary, in a semi-free ranging enclosure located in an equatorial forest, showed fever and strong anaemia associated with a high Plasmodium reichenowi infection, shortly after release. The animal recovered from anaemia after several months despite recurrent infection with other Plasmodium species. This may be the first description of malaria-like symptoms in a chimpanzee infected with Plasmodium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,503,765
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#555
of 5,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,330
of 267,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#20
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.