↓ Skip to main content

The effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil against post-resuscitation myocardial and intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction by attenuating apoptosis and regulating microRNAs expression…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil against post-resuscitation myocardial and intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction by attenuating apoptosis and regulating microRNAs expression: essential role of nitric oxide syntheses signaling
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0550-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Zhang, Guoxing Wang, Wei Yuan, Junyuan Wu, Miaomiao Wang, ChunSheng Li

Abstract

Recent experimental and clinical studies have indicated the cardioprotective role of sildenafil during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Sildenafil has been shown to attenuate postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction in piget models of ventricular fibrillation. This study was designed to investigate if administration of sildenafil will attenuate post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction by attenuating apoptosis and regulating miRNA expressions, furthermore, ameliorating the severity of post-microcirculatory dysfunction. Twenty-four male pigs (weighing 30 ± 2 kg) were randomly divided into groups, sildenafil pretreatment (n = 8), saline (n = 8) and sham operation (sham, n = 8). Sildenafil pretreatment consisted of 0.5 mg/kg sildenafil, administered once intraperitoneally 30 min prior to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Eight minutes of untreated VF was followed by defibrillation in anesthetized, closed-chest pigs. Hemodynamic status and blood samples were obtained at 0 min, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Surviving pigs were euthanatized at 24 h after ROSC, and hearts were removed for analysis by electron microscopy, western blotting, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Intestinal microcirculatory blood flow was visualized by a sidestream dark-field imaging device at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after ROSC. Compared with the saline group, the sildenafil group had a higher 24-hour survival (7/8 versus 3/8 survivors, p < 0.05) and a better outcome in hemodynamic parameters. The protective effect of sildenafil also correlated with reduced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, as evidenced by reduced TUNEL-positive cells, increased anti-apoptotic Bcl-2/Bax ratio and inhibited caspase-3 activity in myocardium. Additionally, sildenafil treatment inhibited the increases in the microRNA-1 levels and alleviated the decreases in the microRNA-133a levels which negatively regulates pro-apoptotic genes. At 6 h after ROSC, post-resuscitation perfused vessel density and microcirculatory flow index were significantly lower in the saline group than in the sildenafil group. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) sildenafil improved post-resuscitation perfusion of the heart, and thus reduced cardiac myocyte apoptosis and improved cardiac function; (2) sildenafil treatment inhibited the increases in the microRNA-1 levels, but alleviated the decreases in the microRNA-133a levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,276,249
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,310
of 3,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,156
of 267,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#102
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.