↓ Skip to main content

Highlights of Keystone symposium ‘Fibrosis: from bench to bedside’

Overview of attention for article published in Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Highlights of Keystone symposium ‘Fibrosis: from bench to bedside’
Published in
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1755-1536-7-11
Authors

Judith Jeanette de Haan, Fatih Arslan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#34
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,097
of 230,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them