↓ Skip to main content

Clinical impact of circulating miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b in plasma of patients with acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical impact of circulating miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b in plasma of patients with acute myocardial infarction
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40001-015-0148-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chencheng Li, Xiaonan Chen, Junwen Huang, Qianqian Sun, Lei Wang

Abstract

Aberrant expression of several types of miRNAs has been reported in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The objective of our study was to compare miRNA expression in AMI patients and normal healthy people and determine whether miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b could be measured in plasma as indicators for AMI. Detection of AMI patients and normal persons by using miRNA microarray chip analysis and miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b was screened out. Eighty-seven AMI patients and 87 homogeneous healthy individuals were recruited. Total mRNA including miRNA was isolated and miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b expression were determined by qRT-PCR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the instructive power of miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b for AMI. Dual-luciferase reporter assays indicated p21 is a direct target of miR-208b. miR-26a and miR-191 were low expressed in AMI compared with normal healthy people, but miR-208b was expressed at a high level in AMI. miR-26a showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, with a sensitivity of 73.6 % and a specificity of 72.4 %.The AUC for miR-191 was 0.669, with a sensitivity of 62.1 % and a specificity of 69.0 %.The AUC for miR-208b was 0.674, with a sensitivity of 59.8 % and a specificity of 73.6 %. miR-208b was significantly increased in the AMI compared with healthy people, while miR-26a and miR-191 were decreased. miR-26a, miR-191, and miR-208b were potential indices of AMI, and miR-208b was more effective in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#728
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,667
of 280,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.