↓ Skip to main content

Development of gold nanoparticles biosensor for ultrasensitive diagnosis of foot and mouth disease virus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of gold nanoparticles biosensor for ultrasensitive diagnosis of foot and mouth disease virus
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12951-018-0374-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mervat E. Hamdy, Michele Del Carlo, Hussein A. Hussein, Taher A. Salah, Ayman H. El-Deeb, Mohamed M. Emara, Guilia Pezzoni, Dario Compagnone

Abstract

Nano-PCR is a recent tool that is used in viral diseases diagnosis. The technique depends on the fundamental effects of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and is considered a very effective and sensitive tool in the diagnosis of different diseases including viral diseases. Although several techniques are currently available to diagnose foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV), a highly sensitive, highly specific technique is needed for specific diagnosis of the disease. In the present work, a novel AuNPs biosensor has been designed using thiol-linked oligonucleotides that recognize the conserved 3D gene of FMDV. The AuNPs-FMDV biosensor specifically recognizes RNA standards of FMDV, but not that of swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) isolates. The analytical sensitivity of the AuNPs-FMDV biosensor was 10 copy number RNA standards in RT-PCR and 1 copy number RNA standard in real-time rRT-PCR with a 94.5% efficiency, 0.989 R2, a - 3.544 slope and 100% specificity (no cross-reactivity with SVDV). These findings were confirmed by the specific and sensitive recognition of 31 Egyptian FMDV clinical isolates that represents the three FMDV serotypes (O, A, and SAT2). The AuNPs-FMDV biosensor presents in this study demonstrates a superior analytical and clinical performance for FMDV diagnosis. In addition, this biosensor has a simple workflow and accelerates epidemiological surveillance, hence, it is qualified as an efficient FMDV diagnosis tool for quarantine stations and farms particularly in FMDV endemic areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 34 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Chemistry 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 41 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,880,713
of 23,393,513 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#952
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,454
of 326,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.