You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Experience of using beta-D-glucan assays in the intensive care unit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2044-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A. Dagens, N. Mughal, A. Sisson, L. S. P. Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 25% |
Spain | 3 | 13% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 22% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,807,558
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,414
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,959
of 339,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#54
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.