↓ Skip to main content

Current achievements and future perspectives in whole-organ bioengineering

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current achievements and future perspectives in whole-organ bioengineering
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13287-015-0089-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Peloso, Abritee Dhal, Joao P Zambon, Peng Li, Giuseppe Orlando, Anthony Atala, Shay Soker

Abstract

Irreversible end-stage organ failure represents one of the leading causes of death, and organ transplantation is currently the only curative solution. Donor organ shortage and adverse effects of immunosuppressive regimens are the major limiting factors for this definitive practice. Recent developments in bioengineering and regenerative medicine could provide a solid base for the future creation of implantable, bioengineered organs. Whole-organ detergent-perfusion protocols permit clinicians to gently remove all the cells and at the same time preserve the natural three-dimensional framework of the native organ. Several decellularized organs, including liver, kidney, and pancreas, have been created as a platform for further successful seeding. These scaffolds are composed of organ-specific extracellular matrix that contains growth factors important for cellular growth and function. Macro- and microvascular tree is entirely maintained and can be incorporated in the recipient's vascular system after the implant. This review will emphasize recent achievements in the whole-organ scaffolds and at the same time underline complications that the scientific community has to resolve before reaching a functional bioengineered organ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 177 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Master 29 16%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Engineering 21 11%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,177,033
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#278
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,396
of 267,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.