Title |
Alternative splicing detection workflow needs a careful combination of sample prep and bioinformatics analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-16-s9-s2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matteo Carrara, Josephine Lum, Francesca Cordero, Marco Beccuti, Michael Poidinger, Susanna Donatelli, Raffaele Adolfo Calogero, Francesca Zolezzi |
Abstract |
RNA-Seq provides remarkable power in the area of biomarkers discovery and disease characterization. Two crucial steps that affect RNA-Seq experiment results are Library Sample Preparation (LSP) and Bioinformatics Analysis (BA). This work describes an evaluation of the combined effect of LSP methods and BA tools in the detection of splice variants. Different LSPs (TruSeq unstranded/stranded, ScriptSeq, NuGEN) allowed the detection of a large common set of splice variants. However, each LSP also detected a small set of unique transcripts that are characterized by a low coverage and/or FPKM. This effect was particularly evident using the low input RNA NuGEN v2 protocol. Data, derived from NuGEN v2, were not the ideal input for AltDE, especially when the exon-level approach was used. We observed that both splice variant-quantification and exon-level analysis performances were strongly dependent on the number of input reads. Moreover, the ribosomal RNA depletion protocol was less sensitive in detecting splicing variants, possibly due to the significant percentage of the reads mapping to non-coding transcripts. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 28% |
Researcher | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 28% |
Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |