↓ Skip to main content

Costs of receipt and donation of ejaculates in a simultaneous hermaphrodite

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs of receipt and donation of ejaculates in a simultaneous hermaphrodite
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeroen NA Hoffer, Jacintha Ellers, Joris M Koene

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 73%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Psychology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,089
of 191,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.