You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of social approval bias on self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-7-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy M Miller, Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud, Lori A Crane, Al C Marcus, Tim E Byers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#246,629
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#92
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409
of 98,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them