↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 with balanced crystalloid solution on mortality and kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis (6S - Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic…

Overview of attention for article published in this source, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 with balanced crystalloid solution on mortality and kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis (6S - Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock trial): Study protocol, design and rationale for a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial
Published by
Springer Nature, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Perner, Nicolai Haase, Jørn Wetterslev, Anders Åneman, Jyrki Tenhunen, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Gudmundur Klemenzson, Frank Pott, Karen Doris Bødker, Per Martin Bådstøløkken, Asger Bendtsen, Peter Søe-Jensen, Hamid Tousi, Morten Bestle, Malgorzata Pawlowicz, Robert Winding, Hans-Henrik Bülow, Claude Kancir, Morten Steensen, Jonas Nielsen, Bjarne Fogh, Kristian R Madsen, Nils H Larsen, Marcela Carlsson, Jørgen Wiis, John Asger Petersen, Susanne Iversen, Ole Schøidt, Siv Leivdal, Pawel Berezowicz, Ville Pettilä, Esko Ruokonen, Pål Klepstad, Sari Karlsson, Maija Kaukonen, Juha Rutanen, Sigurbergur Karason, Anne Lene Kjældgaard, Lars Broksø Holst, Jan Wernerman, the Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Other 17 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 38 28%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 22 16%