↓ Skip to main content

A gene profiling deconvolution approach to estimating immune cell composition from complex tissues

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A gene profiling deconvolution approach to estimating immune cell composition from complex tissues
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2069-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Hwa Chen, Wen-Yu Kuo, Sheng-Yao Su, Wei-Chun Chung, Jen-Ming Ho, Henry Horng-Shing Lu, Chung-Yen Lin

Abstract

A new emerged cancer treatment utilizes intrinsic immune surveillance mechanism that is silenced by those malicious cells. Hence, studies of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte populations (TILs) are key to the success of advanced treatments. In addition to laboratory methods such as immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, in silico gene expression deconvolution methods are available for analyses of relative proportions of immune cell types. Herein, we used microarray data from the public domain to profile gene expression pattern of twenty-two immune cell types. Initially, outliers were detected based on the consistency of gene profiling clustering results and the original cell phenotype notation. Subsequently, we filtered out genes that are expressed in non-hematopoietic normal tissues and cancer cells. For every pair of immune cell types, we ran t-tests for each gene, and defined differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from this comparison. Equal numbers of DEGs were then collected as candidate lists and numbers of conditions and minimal values for building signature matrixes were calculated. Finally, we used v -Support Vector Regression to construct a deconvolution model. The performance of our system was finally evaluated using blood biopsies from 20 adults, in which 9 immune cell types were identified using flow cytometry. The present computations performed better than current state-of-the-art deconvolution methods. Finally, we implemented the proposed method into R and tested extensibility and usability on Windows, MacOS, and Linux operating systems. The method, MySort, is wrapped as the Galaxy platform pluggable tool and usage details are available at https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/moneycat/mysort/e3afe097e80a .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Computer Science 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,488,697
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,895
of 7,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,388
of 327,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#92
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.