↓ Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in chronic kidney disease patients in Spain before and during dialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in chronic kidney disease patients in Spain before and during dialysis
Published in
Health Economics Review, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13561-015-0049-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blanca Gros, Antonio Galán, Emilio González-Parra, Jose A Herrero, Maria Echave, Stefan Vegter, Keith Tolley, Itziar Oyagüez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,956,103
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#123
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,364
of 266,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.