↓ Skip to main content

Catching allergy by a simple questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catching allergy by a simple questionnaire
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40413-015-0067-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurizio Galimberti, Giovanni Passalacqua, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Vincenzo Castella, Maria Teresa Costantino, Beniamino Cucchi, Sebastiano Gangemi, Gilda Nardi, Paolo Raviolo, Paola Rottoli, Nicola Scichilone, Nico Sciolla, Germano Bettoncelli, Massimo Landi, Erminia Ridolo, Serena Buttafava, Paola Puccinelli, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Alessandro Fiocchi, Franco Frati

Abstract

Identifying allergic rhinitis requires allergy testing, but the first-line referral for rhinitis are usually primary care physicians (PCP), who are not familiar with such tests. The availability of easy and simple tests to be used by PCP to suggest allergy should be very useful. The Respiratory Allergy Prediction (RAP) test, based on 9 questions and previously validated by a panel of experts, was evaluated in this study. An overall number of 401 patients (48.6% males, age range 14-62 years) with respiratory symptoms was included. Of them, 89 (22.2%) showed negative results to SPT, while 312 (77.8%) had at least one positive result to SPT. Cohen's kappa coefficient showed that all questions had an almost perfect excellent agreement between pre and post-test. The algorithm of decision-tree growth Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector showed that answering yes to the question 4 (Your nasal/ocular complains do usually start or worsen during the spring?), 6 (Did you ever had cough or shortness of breath, even during exercise?) and 8 (Do you use nasal sprays frequently?) gave a probability to have a positive SPT of 85%. These findings show that RAP test can be proposed as an useful tool to be used by physician other than allergists when evaluating patients with rhinitis, suggesting the need of allergy testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,139,298
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#203
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,528
of 280,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.