↓ Skip to main content

Prescribed computer games in addition to occlusion versus standard occlusion treatment for childhood amblyopia: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prescribed computer games in addition to occlusion versus standard occlusion treatment for childhood amblyopia: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40814-015-0018-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijay K. Tailor, Selina Glaze, Payal Khandelwal, Alison Davis, Gillian G. W. Adams, Wen Xing, Catey Bunce, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,278,422
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#965
of 1,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,852
of 266,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.