↓ Skip to main content

One-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): mild to moderate myopia vs. high myopia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): mild to moderate myopia vs. high myopia
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12886-015-0051-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Ryun Kim, Bu Ki Kim, Su Joung Mun, Young Taek Chung, Hyun Seung Kim

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high-myopic patients with those of mild- to moderate-myopic patients. This study included 183 eyes of 92 myopic patients treated with SMILE using a VisuMax 500-kHz femtosecond laser. Treated eyes were divided into two groups, according to the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE): mild to moderate myopia (A group, <-6.0 D) and high myopia (B group, ≥ - 6.0 D). Follow-up visits were at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA), postoperative SE, efficacy index, safety index, and predictability. Preoperative SE was -5.05 ± 0.71 D in the A group and -7.67 ± 1.01 D in the B group. No differences were observed between -0.13 ± 0.38 D in the A group and -0.24 ± 0.35 D in the B group 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.18). At 12 months postoperatively, 93.1 % and 76.8 % had an UDVA of 20/20 or better in the A and B groups, respectively. In the A group, 87.9 % and 96.6 % were within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D, respectively, of the intended correction; in the B group, 88.0 % and 97.6 % were within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D, respectively. The efficacy index was 1.04 ± 0.19 in the A group and 0.99 ± 0.19 in the B group. The safety index was 1.27 ± 0.17 for the A group and 1.24 ± 0.17 for the B group. The efficacy and safety index were not significantly different between the two groups 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.141 and p = 0.307, respectively). This study showed that SMILE is effective and safe for correcting high myopia, as well as mild to moderate myopia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,983,585
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#189
of 2,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,805
of 266,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.