↓ Skip to main content

Linear growth faltering in infants is associated with Acidaminococcus sp. and community-level changes in the gut microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linear growth faltering in infants is associated with Acidaminococcus sp. and community-level changes in the gut microbiota
Published in
Microbiome, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40168-015-0089-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ethan K. Gough, David A. Stephens, Erica E.M. Moodie, Andrew J. Prendergast, Rebecca J. Stoltzfus, Jean H. Humphrey, Amee R. Manges

Abstract

Chronic malnutrition, termed stunting, is defined as suboptimal linear growth, affects one third of children in developing countries, and leads to increased mortality and poor developmental outcomes. The causes of childhood stunting are unknown, and strategies to improve growth and related outcomes in children have only had modest impacts. Recent studies have shown that the ecosystem of microbes in the human gut, termed the microbiota, can induce changes in weight. However, the specific changes in the gut microbiota that contribute to growth remain unknown, and no studies have investigated the gut microbiota as a determinant of chronic malnutrition. We performed secondary analyses of data from two well-characterized twin cohorts of children from Malawi and Bangladesh to identify bacterial genera associated with linear growth. In a case-control analysis, we used the graphical lasso to estimate covariance network models of gut microbial interactions from relative genus abundances and used network analysis methods to select genera associated with stunting severity. In longitudinal analyses, we determined associations between these selected microbes and linear growth using between-within twin regression models to adjust for confounding and introduce temporality. Reduced microbiota diversity and increased covariance network density were associated with stunting severity, while increased relative abundance of Acidaminococcus sp. was associated with future linear growth deficits. We show that length growth in children is associated with community-wide changes in the gut microbiota and with the abundance of the bacterial genus, Acidaminococcus. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings and to clarify the mechanisms involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 20%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 56 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,095,138
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,633
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,160
of 278,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.