↓ Skip to main content

Wide-dynamic-range promoters engineered for cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Engineering, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wide-dynamic-range promoters engineered for cyanobacteria
Published in
Journal of Biological Engineering, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1754-1611-7-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsin-Ho Huang, Peter Lindblad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 247 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 25%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 31%
Engineering 11 4%
Chemical Engineering 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 46 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#134
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,234
of 208,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.