↓ Skip to main content

PCSK5 mutation in a patient with the VACTERL association

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PCSK5 mutation in a patient with the VACTERL association
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1166-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukio Nakamura, Shingo Kikugawa, Shoji Seki, Masahiko Takahata, Norimasa Iwasaki, Hidetomi Terai, Mitsuhiro Matsubara, Fumio Fujioka, Hidehito Inagaki, Tatsuya Kobayashi, Tomoatsu Kimura, Hiroki Kurahashi, Hiroyuki Kato

Abstract

The VACTERL association is a typically sporadic, non-random collection of congenital anomalies that includes vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities. Although several chromosomal aberrations and gene muta tions have been reported as disease-causative, these findings have been sparsely replicated to date. In the present study, whole exome sequencing of a case with the VACTERL association uncovered a novel frameshift mutation in the PCSK5 gene, which has been reported as one of the causative genes for the VACTERL association. Although this mutation appears potentially pathogenic in its functional aspects, it was also carried by the healthy father. Furthermore, a database survey revealed several other deleterious variants in the PCSK5 gene in the general population. Further studies are necessary to clarify the etiological role of the PCSK5 mutation in the VACTERL association.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,414,796
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,015
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,180
of 266,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#52
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.