You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High rates of adherence and treatment success in a public and public-private HIV clinic in India: potential benefits of standardized national care delivery systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Shet, Ayesha DeCosta, Elsa Heylen, Suresh Shastri, Sara Chandy, Maria Ekstrand |
| Abstract |
The massive scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) access worldwide has brought tremendous benefit to populations affected by HIV/AIDS. Optimising HIV care in countries with diverse medical systems is critical; however data on best practices for HIV healthcare delivery in resource-constrained settings are limited. This study aimed to understand patient characteristics and treatment outcomes from different HIV healthcare settings in Bangalore, India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 133% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 23% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,124,659
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,420
of 7,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,437
of 138,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#45
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.