↓ Skip to main content

Leishmaniases diagnosis: an update on the use of immunological and molecular tools

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Bioscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leishmaniases diagnosis: an update on the use of immunological and molecular tools
Published in
Cell & Bioscience, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13578-015-0021-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milena de Paiva-Cavalcanti, Rayana Carla Silva de Morais, Rômulo Pessoa-e-Silva, Lays Adrianne Mendonça Trajano-Silva, Suênia da Cunha Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, Diego de Hollanda Cavalcanti Tavares, Maria Carolina Accioly Brelaz-de-Castro, Rafael de Freitas e Silva, Valéria Rêgo Alves Pereira

Abstract

Leishmaniases are caused by obligate intracellular protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania. They cause a spectrum of diseases, most notably visceral (VL), cutaneous (CL), and mucosal (ML) leishmaniasis, which affect millions of people around the world, each year. Despite scientific advances, leishmaniases cases are expanding, constituting an important public health problem. Immunological and molecular diagnostic tools have been increasingly applied for the early detection of these parasitic infections, since the existence of limitations in clinical and parasitological examinations may provide false results, thus interfering in epidemiological research and diseases control. Although there is a great diversity of available immunological assays, important common deficiencies persist, which explains the current exploration of the molecular biology in research fields, especially the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and its variants, such as real-time quantitative PCR. However, in the last years, significant results have also been reached inside of immunological context (especially by Flow Cytometry), for humans and dogs, demonstrated by research works of the New and Old worlds. In spite of their potential to clarify and minimize the present global situation of the diseases, the implementation of molecular or immunological innovative reference assays for VL and CL at health services is still a challenge due to several reasons, including lack of standardization among laboratories and structural concerns. In this article we bring classical and current information about technological advances for the immunological and molecular leishmaniases diagnosis, their features, and applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 230 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 6%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 69 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,036,117
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#132
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,471
of 264,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.