↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of and risk factors for severe cardiovascular collapse after endotracheal intubation in the ICU: a multicenter observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence of and risk factors for severe cardiovascular collapse after endotracheal intubation in the ICU: a multicenter observational study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0975-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastien Perbet, Audrey De Jong, Julie Delmas, Emmanuel Futier, Bruno Pereira, Samir Jaber, Jean-Michel Constantin

Abstract

Severe cardiovascular collapse (CVC) is a life-threatening complication after emergency endotracheal intubation (ETI) in ICU. Many factors may interact with hemodynamic conditions during ETI, but no study to date has focused on factors associated with severe CVC occurrence. This study assessed the incidence of severe CVC after ETI in the ICU and analyzed the factors predictive of severe CVC. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter-study of 1400 consecutive intubations at 42 ICUs. The incidence of severe CVC was assessed in patients who were hemodynamically stable (mean arterial blood pressure > 65 mmHg without vasoactive drugs) before intubation, and the factors predictive of severe CVC were determined by multivariate analysis based on patient and procedure characteristics. Severe CVC occurred following 264 of 885 (29.8 %) intubation procedures. A two-step multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for CVC included simple acute physiologic score II regardless of age (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, p<0.001), age 60-75 years (OR 1.96, p<0.002 vs. < 60 years) and >75 years (OR 2.81, p<0.001 vs. < 60 years), acute respiratory failure as a reason for intubation (OR 1.51, p=0.04), first intubation in the ICU (OR 1.61, p=0.02), NIV as preoxygenation method (OR 1.54, p=0.03) and FiO2 >70 % after intubation (OR 1.91, p=0.001). Comatose patients who required endotracheal intubation were less likely to develop CVC during intubation (OR 0.48, p=0.004). CVC is a frequent complication, especially in old and severely ill patients intubated for acute respiratory failure in the ICU. Specific bundles to prevent CVC may reduce morbidity and mortality related to intubation of these high-risk, critically ill patients. clinicaltrials.gov NCT01532063 , Registered 8 February 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 20%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Engineering 3 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,348,116
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,161
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,384
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.