You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Methods for the inclusion of real-world evidence in network meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01399-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David A. Jenkins, Humaira Hussein, Reynaldo Martina, Pascale Dequen-O’Byrne, Keith R. Abrams, Sylwia Bujkiewicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 36% |
United States | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
Scientists | 7 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,979,863
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#253
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,551
of 438,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.