↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy activation in blood mononuclear cells of fibromyalgia patients: implications in the pathogenesis of the disease

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy activation in blood mononuclear cells of fibromyalgia patients: implications in the pathogenesis of the disease
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/ar2918
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario D Cordero, Manuel De Miguel, Ana M Moreno Fernández, Inés M Carmona López, Juan Garrido Maraver, David Cotán, Lourdes Gómez Izquierdo, Pablo Bonal, Francisco Campa, Pedro Bullon, Plácido Navas, José A Sánchez Alcázar

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome with unknown etiology. Recent studies have shown some evidence demonstrating that oxidative stress may have a role in the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia. However, it is still not clear whether oxidative stress is the cause or the effect of the abnormalities documented in fibromyalgia. Furthermore, the role of mitochondria in the redox imbalance reported in fibromyalgia also is controversial. We undertook this study to investigate the role of mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and mitophagy in fibromyalgia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Other 16 8%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,210,310
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,223
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,411
of 172,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.