↓ Skip to main content

Youth perceptions of how neighborhood physical environment and peers affect physical activity: a focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Youth perceptions of how neighborhood physical environment and peers affect physical activity: a focus group study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12966-015-0246-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan L. Smith, Philip J. Troped, Meghan H. McDonough, J. D. DeFreese

Abstract

There is need for a youth-informed conceptualization of how environmental and social neighborhood contexts influence physical activity. We assessed youths' perceptions of their neighborhood physical and peer environments as affecting physical activity. Thirty-three students (20 girls; ages 12-14 years) participated in focus groups about the physical environment and peers within their neighborhoods, and their understanding of how they affect physical activity. Inductive analysis identified themes of access (e.g., to equipment); aesthetics; physical and social safety; peer proximity and behavior (e.g., bullying); adult support or interference; and adult boundary setting. Participants also identified interconnections among themes, such as traffic shaping parent boundary setting and, in turn, access to physical spaces and peers. Young adolescents view neighborhoods in ways similar to and different from adults. Examining physical and social environments in tandem, while mindful of how adults shape and youth perceive these environments, may enhance understanding of youth physical activity behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 16%
Sports and Recreations 22 14%
Psychology 21 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,787,708
of 24,132,754 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#659
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,681
of 268,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,132,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.