↓ Skip to main content

Heterosexual anal intercourse and HIV infection risks in the context of alcohol serving venues, Cape Town, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heterosexual anal intercourse and HIV infection risks in the context of alcohol serving venues, Cape Town, South Africa
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth C Kalichman, Steven D Pinkerton, Michael P Carey, Demetria Cain, Vuyelwa Mehlomakulu, Kate B Carey, Leickness C Simbayi, Kelvin Mwaba, Ofer Harel

Abstract

The most efficient sexual behavior for HIV transmission is unprotected receptive anal intercourse. However, it is unclear what role heterosexual unprotected anal sex is playing in the world's worst HIV epidemics of southern Africa. The objective is to examine the prevalence of heterosexual unprotected anal intercourse among men and women who drink at informal alcohol serving establishments (shebeens) in South Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Social Sciences 17 22%
Psychology 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,696,346
of 25,386,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,261
of 17,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,944
of 144,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#89
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.