Protocols for uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: a systematic review of international guidelines, practices and transplant outcomes

Iván Ortega-Deballon, Laura Hornby, Sam D. Shemie

A chronic shortage of organs remains the main factor limiting organ transplantation. Many countries have explored the option of uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) in order to expand the donor pool. Little is known regarding the variability of practices and outcomes between existing protocols. This systematic review addresses this knowledge gap informing policy makers, researchers and clinicians for future protocol implementation. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar electronic databases from 2005 to present, as well as the reference lists of selected studies, abstracts, unpublished reports, personal libraries, professional organization reports and government agency statements on uDCD. We contacted leading authors and organizations to request their protocols and guidelines. Two reviewers extracted main variables. In studies reporting transplant outcomes, we added type, quantity, quality of organs procured and complications reported. Internal validity and the quality of the studies reporting outcomes were assessed, as were the methodological rigour and transparency in which a guideline was developed. The review was included in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (Prospero, CRD42014015258). Six guidelines and 18 outcome studies were analysed. The 6 guidelines are based on limited evidence and major differences exist between them at each step of the uDCD process. The outcome studies report good results for kidney, liver and lung transplantation with high discard rates for livers. Despite procedural, medical, economic, legal and ethical challenges, the uDCD strategy is a viable option for increasing the organ donation pool. Variations in practice and heterogeneity of outcomes precludes a meta-analysis and prevented the linking of outcomes to specific uDCD protocols. Further standardization of protocols and outcomes are required as also further research into the role of extracorporeal resuscitation and other novel therapies for treatment of some refractory cardiac arrest. Is essential to ensure the maintenance of trust in uDCD programs by health professionals and the public.