↓ Skip to main content

An anatomical study of lumbar epidural catheterization

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An anatomical study of lumbar epidural catheterization
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12871-015-0069-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huanwei Jiang, Benchao Shi, Shiyuan Xu

Abstract

We herein provide an analysis of lumbar epidural catheterization, which outlines a detailed anatomical description of the epidural anatomy, and may improve the success rate of neuraxial cannulation. Lumbar epidural catheters were placed in 50 adult embalmed cadavers. After catheterization, the lumbar dura and connecting structures between the epidural space and the vertebral body were separated. The positional relationship between the catheter and the posterior epidural space were observed and photographed. Amongst the 50 specimens, the epidural catheter curled into a circle in three cases, entered the intervertebral foramen in two cases, and caused epidural venous damage in five cases. Meningo-vertebral ligaments exist in the posterior epidural space and connect to the venous plexus, which may contribute to epidural catheter failure, uneven distribution of anaesthesia and epidural hemorrhage. Our study provides anaesthesiologists with a better understanding of the anatomy and may mitigate complications of lumbar epidural catheter placement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
Netherlands 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 18%
Other 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 65%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 23%