↓ Skip to main content

One-year survival and resource use after critical illness: impact of organ failure and residual organ dysfunction in a cohort study in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One-year survival and resource use after critical illness: impact of organ failure and residual organ dysfunction in a cohort study in Brazil
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0986-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Otavio T. Ranzani, Fernando G. Zampieri, Bruno A. M. P. Besen, Luciano C. P. Azevedo, Marcelo Park

Abstract

To evaluate the impacts of organ failure and residual dysfunction on one-year survival and health care resource utilization, using the ICU discharge as the starting point. A historical cohort study, including all adult patients discharged alive after at least 72 h of ICU stay in a tertiary teaching hospital in Brazil. The starting point of follow-up was ICU discharge. Organ failure was defined as a value of three or four in its corresponding component of the SOFA score, and residual organ dysfunction was defined as a score of 1-2. We fit a multivariate flexible Cox model to predict one-year survival. We analyzed 690 patients. Mortality at one year after discharge was 27 %. Using multivariate modelling, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, organ dysfunctions and albumin at ICU discharge were the main determinants of one-year survival. Age and organ failure were non-linearly associated with survival, and the impact of organ failure diminished over time. We conducted a subset analysis with 561 patients (81 %) discharged without organ failure over the previous 24 h of discharge, and the number of residual organs in dysfunction remained strongly associated with reduced one-year survival. The utilization of health care resources among hospital survivors was substantial within one year: 40 % of the patients were re-hospitalized, 52 % visited the emergency department, 90 % were seen at the outpatient clinic, 14 % attended rehabilitation outpatient services, 11 % were followed by the psychological/psychiatric service, and 7 % used the day hospital facility. Use of health care resources up to 30 days after hospital discharge was associated with the number of organs in dysfunction at ICU discharge. Organ failure was an important determinant of one-year outcomes of critically ill survivors. Nevertheless, the impact of organ failure tended to diminish over time. Resource utilization after critical illness was elevated among ICU survivors, and a targeted action is needed to deliver appropriate care and to reduce the late critical illness burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,468,049
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,761
of 6,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,646
of 396,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#394
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.