↓ Skip to main content

Involvement of cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factor II in hippocampal long-term depression and behavioral flexibility

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Brain, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Involvement of cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factor II in hippocampal long-term depression and behavioral flexibility
Published in
Molecular Brain, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13041-015-0130-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyungmin Lee, Yuki Kobayashi, Hyunhyo Seo, Ji-Hye Kwak, Akira Masuda, Chae-Seok Lim, Hye-Ryeon Lee, SukJae Joshua Kang, Pojeong Park, Su-Eon Sim, Naomi Kogo, Hiroaki Kawasaki, Bong-Kiun Kaang, Shigeyoshi Itohara

Abstract

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) activate small GTPases that are involved in several cellular functions. cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factor II (cAMP-GEF II) acts as a target for cAMP independently of protein kinase A (PKA) and functions as a GEF for Rap1 and Rap2. Although cAMP-GEF II is expressed abundantly in several brain areas including the cortex, striatum, and hippocampus, its specific function and possible role in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and cognitive processes remain elusive. Here, we investigated how cAMP-GEF II affects synaptic function and animal behavior using cAMP-GEF II knockout mice. We found that deletion of cAMP-GEF II induced moderate decrease in long-term potentiation, although this decrease was not statistically significant. On the other hand, it produced a significant and clear impairment in NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses of hippocampus, while microscopic morphology, basal synaptic transmission, and depotentiation were normal. Behavioral testing using the Morris water maze and automated IntelliCage system showed that cAMP-GEF II deficient mice had moderately reduced behavioral flexibility in spatial learning and memory. We concluded that cAMP-GEF II plays a key role in hippocampal functions including behavioral flexibility in reversal learning and in mechanisms underlying induction of long-term depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 29%
Psychology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,417,643
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#859
of 1,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,618
of 264,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.