↓ Skip to main content

Quality estimation of the electrocardiogram using cross-correlation among leads

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality estimation of the electrocardiogram using cross-correlation among leads
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12938-015-0053-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Morgado, Felipe Alonso-Atienza, Ricardo Santiago-Mozos, Óscar Barquero-Pérez, Ikaro Silva, Javier Ramos, Roger Mark

Abstract

Fast and accurate quality estimation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is a relevant research topic that has attracted considerable interest in the scientific community, particularly due to its impact on tele-medicine monitoring systems, where the ECG is collected by untrained technicians. In recent years, a number of studies have addressed this topic, showing poor performance in discriminating between clinically acceptable and unacceptable ECG records. This paper presents a novel, simple and accurate algorithm to estimate the quality of the 12-lead ECG by exploiting the structure of the cross-covariance matrix among different leads. Ideally, ECG signals from different leads should be highly correlated since they capture the same electrical activation process of the heart. However, in the presence of noise or artifacts the covariance among these signals will be affected. Eigenvalues of the ECG signals covariance matrix are fed into three different supervised binary classifiers. The performance of these classifiers were evaluated using PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2011 data. Our best quality classifier achieved an accuracy of 0.898 in the test set, while having a complexity well below the results of contestants who participated in the Challenge, thus making it suitable for implementation in current cellular devices.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 38%
Computer Science 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 20%