↓ Skip to main content

The diversification of PHIS transposon superfamily in eukaryotes

Overview of attention for article published in Mobile DNA, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The diversification of PHIS transposon superfamily in eukaryotes
Published in
Mobile DNA, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13100-015-0043-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min-Jin Han, Chu-Lin Xiong, Hong-Bo Zhang, Meng-Qiang Zhang, Hua-Hao Zhang, Ze Zhang

Abstract

PHIS transposon superfamily belongs to DNA transposons and includes PIF/Harbinger, ISL2EU, and Spy transposon groups. These three groups have similar DDE domain-containing transposases; however, their coding capacity, species distribution, and target site duplications (TSDs) are significantly different. In this study, we systematically identified and analyzed PHIS transposons in 836 sequenced eukaryotic genomes using transposase homology search and structure approach. In total, 380 PHIS families were identified in 112 genomes and 168 of 380 families were firstly reported in this study. Besides previous identified PIF/Harbinger, ISL2EU, and Spy groups, three new types (called Pangu, NuwaI, and NuwaII) of PHIS superfamily were identified; each has its own distinctive characteristics, especially in TSDs. Pangu and NuwaII transposons are characterized by 5'-ANT-3' and 5'-C|TNA|G-3' TSDs, respectively. Both transposons are widely distributed in plants, fungi, and animals; the NuwaI transposons are characterized by 5'-CWG-3' TSDs and mainly distributed in animals. Here, in total, 380 PHIS families were identified in eukaryotes. Among these 380 families, 168 were firstly reported in this study. Furthermore, three new types of PHIS superfamily were identified. Our results not only enrich the transposon diversity but also have extensive significance for improving genome sequence assembly and annotation of higher organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Uruguay 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 56 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Unknown 59 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,417,643
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Mobile DNA
#314
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,618
of 264,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobile DNA
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.