↓ Skip to main content

Chromothripsis is a common mechanism driving genomic rearrangements in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chromothripsis is a common mechanism driving genomic rearrangements in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
Published in
Genome Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wigard P Kloosterman, Marlous Hoogstraat, Oscar Paling, Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki, Ivo Renkens, Joost S Vermaat, Markus J van Roosmalen, Stef van Lieshout, Isaac J Nijman, Wijnand Roessingh, Ruben van 't Slot, José van de Belt, Victor Guryev, Marco Koudijs, Emile Voest, Edwin Cuppen

Abstract

Structural rearrangements form a major class of somatic variation in cancer genomes. Local chromosome shattering, termed chromothripsis, is a mechanism proposed to be the cause of clustered chromosomal rearrangements and was recently described to occur in a small percentage of tumors. The significance of these clusters for tumor development or metastatic spread is largely unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 211 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 26%
Researcher 55 25%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 16%
Computer Science 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 23 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,528,647
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,239
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,955
of 150,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.