↓ Skip to main content

Preventing malaria transmission by indoor residual spraying in Malawi: grappling with the challenge of uncertain sustainability

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventing malaria transmission by indoor residual spraying in Malawi: grappling with the challenge of uncertain sustainability
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0759-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel Chanda, Themba Mzilahowa, John Chipwanya, Shadreck Mulenga, Doreen Ali, Peter Troell, Wilfred Dodoli, John M Govere, John Gimnig

Abstract

In the past decade, there has been rapid scale-up of insecticide-based malaria vector control in the context of integrated vector management (IVM) according to World Health Organization recommendations. Endemic countries have deployed indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets as hallmark vector control interventions. This paper discusses the successes and continued challenges and the way forward for the IRS programme in Malawi. The National Malaria Control Programme in Malawi, with its efforts to implement an integrated approach to malaria vector control, was the 'case' for this study. Information sources included all available data and accessible archived documentary records on IRS in Malawi. A methodical assessment of published and unpublished documents was conducted via a literature search of online electronic databases. Malawi has implemented IRS as the main malaria transmission-reducing intervention. However, pyrethroid and carbamate resistance in malaria vectors has been detected extensively across the country and has adversely affected the IRS programme. Additionally, IRS activities have been characterized by substantial inherent logistical and technical challenges culminating into missed targets. As a consequence, programmatic IRS operations have been scaled down from seven districts in 2010 to only one district in 2014. The future of the IRS programme in Malawi is uncertain due to limited funding, high cost of alternative insecticides and technical resource challenges being experienced in the country. The availability of a long-lasting formulation of the organophosphate pirimiphos-methyl makes the re-introduction of IRS a possibility and may be a useful approach for the management of pyrethroid resistance. Implementing the IVM strategy, advocating for sustainable domestic funding, including developing an insecticide resistance monitoring and management plan and vector surveillance guidelines will be pivotal in steering entomologic monitoring and future vector control activities in Malawi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 176 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 50 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 56 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,863,058
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,901
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,322
of 268,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#40
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.