↓ Skip to main content

Surgical stress and postoperative complications related to regional and radical mastectomy in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical stress and postoperative complications related to regional and radical mastectomy in dogs
Published in
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13028-015-0121-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo S. Horta, Mariana S. Figueiredo, Gleidice E. Lavalle, Mariana P. Costa, Rubia M. C. Cunha, Roberto B. Araújo

Abstract

Surgery is the treatment of choice for regional control of mammary neoplasms in female dogs. Various surgical techniques may be used, as long as mammary gland anatomy, lymphatic drainage, and known prognostic factors are respected. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical stress-including duration of surgery, nociception and hematological changes-and postoperative complications in dogs undergoing regional and unilateral radical mastectomy. Eighteen dogs were selected for each technique. Postoperative pain (nociception), hematological changes, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The group treated with radical mastectomy had a longer surgical duration, showed more intense physiological changes, achieved higher scores on nociception scales, and experienced more postoperative complications. Compared to regional mastectomy, radical mastectomy was associated with longer surgical duration, greater nociceptive stimulus, greater surgical stress, and higher incidence of postoperative complications in dogs. Although evaluation of long-term results was not a goal of this study, it is suggested that postoperative recovery and patient quality of life should be considered when choosing a surgical approach for treating mammary tumors in dogs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Postgraduate 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 41 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Unspecified 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#125
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,334
of 278,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.