↓ Skip to main content

Why medical students do not choose a career in geriatrics: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 3,262)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
128 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why medical students do not choose a career in geriatrics: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Education, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0384-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariadne A. Meiboom, Henk de Vries, Cees M.P.M. Hertogh, Fedde Scheele

Abstract

While the demand for doctors specialised in the medical care of elderly patients is increasing, the interest among medical students for a career in geriatrics is lagging behind. To get an overview of the different factors reported in the literature that affect the (low) interest among medical students for a career in geriatrics, a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and ERIC. Quality assessment criteria were applied. Twenty studies met the criteria and were included in the review. In relation to the nature of the work, the preference of medical students is young patients, and acute somatic diseases that can be cured. The complexity of the geriatric patient deters students from choosing this specialty. Exposure by means of pre-clinical and particularly clinical education increases interest. The lack of status and the financial aspects have a negative influence on interest. Exposure to geriatrics by means of education is necessary. The challenge in geriatric education is to show the rewarding aspects of the specialty.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 42 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 43 64%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#370,951
of 22,557,763 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#22
of 3,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,529
of 252,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,557,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them