You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why medical students do not choose a career in geriatrics: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-015-0384-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariadne A. Meiboom, Henk de Vries, Cees M.P.M. Hertogh, Fedde Scheele |
| Abstract |
While the demand for doctors specialised in the medical care of elderly patients is increasing, the interest among medical students for a career in geriatrics is lagging behind. To get an overview of the different factors reported in the literature that affect the (low) interest among medical students for a career in geriatrics, a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and ERIC. Quality assessment criteria were applied. Twenty studies met the criteria and were included in the review. In relation to the nature of the work, the preference of medical students is young patients, and acute somatic diseases that can be cured. The complexity of the geriatric patient deters students from choosing this specialty. Exposure by means of pre-clinical and particularly clinical education increases interest. The lack of status and the financial aspects have a negative influence on interest. Exposure to geriatrics by means of education is necessary. The challenge in geriatric education is to show the rewarding aspects of the specialty. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 29 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 17% |
| United States | 15 | 12% |
| Spain | 12 | 9% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 23% |
| Scientists | 23 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#395,518
of 24,372,222 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#19
of 3,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,394
of 271,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.