↓ Skip to main content

Menacalc, a quantitative method of metastasis assessment, as a prognostic marker for axillary node-negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Menacalc, a quantitative method of metastasis assessment, as a prognostic marker for axillary node-negative breast cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1468-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine L. Forse, Seema Agarwal, Dushanthi Pinnaduwage, Frank Gertler, John S. Condeelis, Juan Lin, Xiaonan Xue, Kimberly Johung, Anna Marie Mulligan, Thomas E. Rohan, Shelley B. Bull, Irene L. Andrulis

Abstract

Mena(calc) is an immunofluorescence-based, quantitative method in which expression of the non-invasive Mena protein isoform (Mena11a) is subtracted from total Mena protein expression. Previous work has found a significant positive association between Mena(calc) and risk of death from breast cancer. Our goal was to determine if Mena(calc) could be used as an independent prognostic marker for axillary node-negative (ANN) breast cancer. Analysis of the association of Mena(calc) with overall survival (death from any cause) was performed for 403 ANN tumors using Kaplan Meier survival curves and the univariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) model with the log-rank or the likelihood ratio test. Cox PH models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of Mena(calc) with risk of death after adjustment for HER2 status and clinicopathological tumor features. High Mena(calc) was associated with increased risk of death from any cause (P = 0.0199, HR (CI) = 2.18 (1.19, 4.00)). A similarly elevated risk of death was found in the subset of the Mena(calc) cohort which did not receive hormone or chemotherapy (n = 142) (P = 0.0052, HR (CI) = 3.80 (1.58, 9.97)). There was a trend toward increased risk of death with relatively high Mena(calc) in the HER2, basal and luminal molecular subtypes. Mena(calc) may serve as an independent prognostic biomarker for the ANN breast cancer patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,750,494
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,062
of 8,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,464
of 264,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#58
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.