↓ Skip to main content

Multimodality therapy approaches, local and systemic treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone in recurrent glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multimodality therapy approaches, local and systemic treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone in recurrent glioblastoma
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1488-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Scorsetti, Pierina Navarria, Federico Pessina, Anna Maria Ascolese, Giuseppe D’Agostino, Stefano Tomatis, Fiorenza De Rose, Elisa Villa, Giulia Maggi, Matteo Simonelli, Elena Clerici, Riccardo Soffietti, Armando Santoro, Luca Cozzi, Lorenzo Bello

Abstract

Long-term local control in Glioblastoma is rarely achieved and nearly all patients relapse. In this study we evaluated the clinical effect of different treatment approaches in recurrent patients. Forty-three patients, with median age of 51 years were evaluated for salvage treatment: re-resection and/or re-irradiation plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0. Twenty-one patients underwent chemotherapy combined with local treatment, surgery and/or radiation therapy, and 22 underwent chemotherapy only. The median follow up was 7 months (range 3-28 months). The 1 and 2-years Progression Free Survival was 65 and 10 % for combined treatment and 22 and 0 % for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). The 1 and 2-years overall survival was 69 and 29 % for combined and 26 and 0 % for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). No toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. These data showed that in glioblastoma recurrence the combination of several approaches in a limited group of patients is more effective than a single treatment alone. This stress the importance of multimodality treatment whenever clinically feasible.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 48%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 29%