↓ Skip to main content

The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, May 1996
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-28-2-161
Authors

THE Meuwissen, ME Goddard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 83%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#303
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,390
of 26,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them