↓ Skip to main content

Major dietary patterns in relation to menstrual pain: a nested case control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 2,329)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Major dietary patterns in relation to menstrual pain: a nested case control study
Published in
BMC Women's Health, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12905-018-0558-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nastaran Najafi, Hamidreza Khalkhali, Fatemeh Moghaddam Tabrizi, Rasoul Zarrin

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea is one of the most prevalent gynecological disorders, experienced by approximately two third of young women during menstruation. According to literature, nutrition can play a key role in the prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhea. This study aims to investigate the relation between dietary patterns and the risk of dysmenorrhea among university students. A nested case control study was conducted among 293 students of Urmia University of Medical Sciences who were randomly recruited via a proportional cluster sampling method. From 293 students, 46 students with moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and 54 students without dysmenorrhea were assigned to the case and control groups, respectively. The major dietary patterns of students were identified by factor analysis and the association between dietary patterns and risk of dysmenorrhea was investigated using logistic regression analysis in SPSS 20. Three major dietary patterns were found and nominated as "Lacto-vegetarian", "Snacks" and "Mixed food items" patterns. After controlling for family history of dysmenorrhea, subjects in the second and third tertiles of "snacks" pattern had a 4.23 (95% CI = 1.32-13.58, P = 0.01) and 3.41 (95% CI = 1.10-10.50, P = 0.03) times, respectively, higher chance to experience moderate to severe dysmenorrhea in comparison with subjects in the first tertile. There was no significant association between the risk of dysmenorrhea and two other dietary patterns. The results indicate that adherence to "snacks" pattern is associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea during menstruation among young women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 18%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 7 3%
Researcher 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 119 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Engineering 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 124 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#117,924
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#10
of 2,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,662
of 344,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.